Updated: Wednesday August 10, 2011
Story by: JOSH MEMENTO
The Chief from Kalapata area bore the brunt of telling the world that his people were dying of hunger. This was after Government Spokesman Alfred Mutua challenged the media on his weekly media briefing to reveal any information of a person who had died of hunger and not disease or old age. Who between the two should have lost his job?
Dr. Mutua was serving his employer diligently by covering his nakedness even when the employer was dying. The Kalapata Chief was serving to save his people from more deaths. Kenyans of goodwill could not turned p in large numbers had they known that the government was on top of things in alleviating hunger. But because we knew the bureaucracy and sluggishness in attending to issues that deserves urgency, Kenyans-for-Kenya went out to help their brothers and sisters suffering suffering in Northern Kenya.
Indeed it should have Mutua who should have lost his job for not representing facts. Being out of touch with the people that pays him, is a crime that should have cost him his job. But this is Kenya. The chief was sacked for exposing the dire situation affecting his people. To rub salt to an injury, the Internal Security Permanent Secretary Francis Kimemia justifies sacking the chiefs. Where do this guys live? Indeed now I understand why when most people coming from these regions claim to be coming to Kenya when they coming to Nairobi. This is because they do not consider themselves to be in Kenya.
This impervious government turned its deaf ear on the meteorological warning that that rain would not be enough and many people would suffer famine. If indeed the problem was logistic as the government's spin doctor want Kenyans to believe, they could have measures in place to avail the food to the people at the opportune. However what we see is shameful knee-jerk reactions to hunger when people are already dying.
From the success stories, that have aired in the media, Kenya is not hungering for food but for resolute leadership. Why would a government that has taken oath to protect Kenyans, result to reactionary measures of sending relief food when these people can in fact feed themselves. Information is power. Many of these in Northern Kenya do not have a choice to be pastoralists but this is the source of livelihood that they know. If the government can avail water either from the underground or from the rivers across the country, these areas can be food sufficient. Sacking the chiefs was not a solution to the problem of hunger. This exemplifies a situation of killing the messenger from bringing the message to the relevant people.
Wake up guys! Kenyans will not remember you for the good cars that you drive or by how well you argue on behalf of your employer but by how well you represent actual information. Dr. Mutua must be forced to resign for denying that there were people suffering of hunger; the chiefs should be promoted for bringing to the attention of Kenyans the fate of his people.
Story by: JOSH MEMENTO
The Chief from Kalapata area bore the brunt of telling the world that his people were dying of hunger. This was after Government Spokesman Alfred Mutua challenged the media on his weekly media briefing to reveal any information of a person who had died of hunger and not disease or old age. Who between the two should have lost his job?
Dr. Mutua was serving his employer diligently by covering his nakedness even when the employer was dying. The Kalapata Chief was serving to save his people from more deaths. Kenyans of goodwill could not turned p in large numbers had they known that the government was on top of things in alleviating hunger. But because we knew the bureaucracy and sluggishness in attending to issues that deserves urgency, Kenyans-for-Kenya went out to help their brothers and sisters suffering suffering in Northern Kenya.
Indeed it should have Mutua who should have lost his job for not representing facts. Being out of touch with the people that pays him, is a crime that should have cost him his job. But this is Kenya. The chief was sacked for exposing the dire situation affecting his people. To rub salt to an injury, the Internal Security Permanent Secretary Francis Kimemia justifies sacking the chiefs. Where do this guys live? Indeed now I understand why when most people coming from these regions claim to be coming to Kenya when they coming to Nairobi. This is because they do not consider themselves to be in Kenya.
This impervious government turned its deaf ear on the meteorological warning that that rain would not be enough and many people would suffer famine. If indeed the problem was logistic as the government's spin doctor want Kenyans to believe, they could have measures in place to avail the food to the people at the opportune. However what we see is shameful knee-jerk reactions to hunger when people are already dying.
From the success stories, that have aired in the media, Kenya is not hungering for food but for resolute leadership. Why would a government that has taken oath to protect Kenyans, result to reactionary measures of sending relief food when these people can in fact feed themselves. Information is power. Many of these in Northern Kenya do not have a choice to be pastoralists but this is the source of livelihood that they know. If the government can avail water either from the underground or from the rivers across the country, these areas can be food sufficient. Sacking the chiefs was not a solution to the problem of hunger. This exemplifies a situation of killing the messenger from bringing the message to the relevant people.
Wake up guys! Kenyans will not remember you for the good cars that you drive or by how well you argue on behalf of your employer but by how well you represent actual information. Dr. Mutua must be forced to resign for denying that there were people suffering of hunger; the chiefs should be promoted for bringing to the attention of Kenyans the fate of his people.
No comments:
Post a Comment